Cc: jonathan.jordan@ncleg.net, chuck.mcgrady@ncleg.net, john.faircloth@ncleg.net, rick.glazier@ncleg.net, pat.hurley@ncleg.net, mickey.michaux@ncleg.net, Paul.Stam@ncleg.net, rob.bryan@ncleg.net, debra.conrad@ncleg.net, leo.daughtry@ncleg.net, valerie.foushee@ncleg.net, joe.queen@ncleg.net, bobbie.richardson@ncleg.net
Author Archives: Jude Eden, Jane of Trades
House Bill 786 – Defection of the Rank and File Exposes Short Shrift for Citizens
Cc: jonathan.jordan@ncleg.net, chuck.mcgrady@ncleg.net, john.faircloth@ncleg.net, rick.glazier@ncleg.net, pat.hurley@ncleg.net, mickey.michaux@ncleg.net, Paul.Stam@ncleg.net, rob.bryan@ncleg.net, debra.conrad@ncleg.net, leo.daughtry@ncleg.net, valerie.foushee@ncleg.net, joe.queen@ncleg.net, bobbie.richardson@ncleg.net
An Open Letter to Senator Richard Burr
April 23, 2013
Senator Burr,
On April 11th, to our dismay, you joined 15 other Republicans in a vote to proceed on the Reid gun legislation (S 649) inappropriately named the “Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013.” As we know, procedural votes are policy votes and one should never bring bad bills to the floor by voting for a motion to proceed. So, In other words, why would you vote to proceed on a bad bill so you can then vote against it?
It only makes sense if you are trying to have it both ways. You stated:
“To be clear from the outset, I do not support S. 649, nor do I support the Manchin-Toomey background check amendment. The vote yesterday was not on the specifics of these bills or whether they should be filibustered; rather, the vote was solely about whether we should begin a debate in the Senate on the issue. Since the leadership of the Senate agreed to unlimited debate and amendments, I believed it was important that the Senate at least have an open discussion. However, it is important to remember that S. 649, amendments to it, and any other gun control measures that come before the Senate are still subject to the filibuster, as well as up-or-down votes.”
Sir, as you know, the debate on the 2nd Amendment was settled over 200 years ago. There is no need for this Congress to have an “open discussion”. Stating you do not support S 649 now is a little too late. We wouldn’t even need to be writing this letter if you and 16 fellow Republicans hadn’t advanced the Reid gun control legislation. In addition the undersigned are further dismayed you would have cast this vote in light of all the times we contacted your office and your staff has always assured us you would never support any infringement of our 2nd Amendment rights and in fact, had even signed onto a filibuster of the Reid legislation.
To be clear, lawmakers will not get a pass on any vote that allows a bad bill to proceed that will infringe on the constitutional rights of the American people. Your vote has made this a very real possibility.
Therefore, the undersigned are requesting a teleconference/Twitter town hall in the next few days at a date and time of your convenience. We would love to have ½ hour of your time to ask you questions about this issue. Please reply to either Mary Ann or Virginia directly with your date and time.
Respectfully,
Virginia A. Quaglia, OIB, NC
Mary Ann McCarthy, Southport, NC
Joined by:
Citizens for Constitutional Liberties (Wayne County Tea)
Roanoke Valley Patriots
Tea Party Patriots of Jackson County
Moore Tea Citizens
Crystal Coast Tea Party of Carteret County
Asheville Tea Party PAC
Haywood 9/12
Surry County Tea Party
NC Tea Party Coalition
Western NC Tea
Cherokee County 9/12
Dr. Dan’s Freedom Forum
Catawba Valley Tea Party
Stand Up NC of Iredell County
We The People of Brunswick County
Feet to the Fire
Dear Gang of 8
There should be no discussion whatsoever about changing or amending immigration policy without first securing our border, enforcing current immigration law, and implementing E-verify. The Boston Marathon bombing perfectly illustrates why we should insist that our borders be secured and our immigration policy vigorously enforced. Our borders are wide open and we all know it. You have no idea who the millions of illegal immigrants in this country are: You don’t know why they came, where they’ve been, what they bring with them. You haven’t asked each and every one of them. Our current immigration process does just that – so the United States knows that when an immigrant has become a citizen, his background has been checked for criminal records, his blood checked for communicable diseases, his financial records checked for stability, his knowledge of the country, its laws, and his reasons for being here committed to record. My husband went through that process and became a citizen, it’s not that hard!
The millions who go through that process have declared that they want to be citizens and they obeyed our laws so that they too could be protected by those laws. Many fled from countries where they didn’t have such protection. The last idea our representatives should be entertaining is to pile millions of illegal immigrants – who didn’t want to bother with our legal process – on top of the millions who did. This is already an overburdened process. How much extra taxpayer funded staff will have to be added to field the paperwork of all the new Amnesty recipients? How many legal immigrants’ cases will be slowed and pushed aside for illegals to get a cheap ticket at the front? Why should law-breakers be rewarded? Why should law-abiding legal immigrants be so slighted?
You should demand that every inch of our border is protected, fenced, surveiled and patrolled. You should oppose illegal immigrants being given any tax-payer funded services or driver’s licenses which are magnets drawing them here. You should demand the implementation of E-verify. This obvious and peaceful solution will have illegals returning to their countries of origin on their own. The interest of Big Businesses who want cheap labor are not more important than the safety of every citizen and the livelihoods of citizens out of work in Obama’s horrible economy. You should demand the implementation of voter ID – stand against those who are nullifying the votes of legal citizens with their fraud. Give these three to five years to work before discussing any Amnesty policy.
The anti-gun bill was killed this week. People know that where crazy people commit mass shootings and crazy Jihadists commit mass bombings, we need to be able to protect ourselves every single day. The best defense against both threats are law-abiding gun-owners exercising their right to bear arms, and the government and criminals shouldn’t be the only ones with guns. Your Amnesty bill should fail for similar reasons because it’s not just terrorists that are a concern. In my home of North Carolina there are dozens and dozens of crimes committed every month by illegal aliens. They are drunk drivers, rapists, molesters, batterers and murderers. We know about the government’s catch-and-release policy. We know of all the criminals who were released, supposedly in preparation for Obama’s Sequestration. The purpose of the government is to protect its citizens and part of that is securing our borders and enforcing the law. It’s obvious, we all know it, every country does it and there’s nothing racially charged or unfair about it. Stop the push for Amnesty!
Boston Thrives and Terror Will Never Prevail!
Updated 4/19…now that we know the bombers were…wait for it….MUSLIM TERRORISTS!…
Last night I was playing music with my buddy Jeff, the other half of our cello-guitar duo Upstarts & Rogues. I had been thinking about Boston and a couple of songs that I wrote after the 9-11 attacks. One of them is on our new record, Twain Shall Meet, called “Micha’s Song.” As I write on the description, “I originally wrote this song back in 2002 to my best friend. The Towers had been attacked and everything had changed, we were still trying to make sense of what had happened. I was looking at two halves of a circle – love and death. I dreamed that if everyone could know that kind of solidity and warmth, complete love and trust, there would be no desire for suicide bombing, mass shootings, war. But there is always someone who wants to kill and destroy, and as I sing “no more war, no more strife” it is a plea however naive – to the suicide bombers, to the mass-shooters…No more! And coming back in the end to that friendship…”
And as we practiced last night I sang, and sang “no more bombings…no more terror…no more bombs! until I crumpled into sobs. How can someone do such a thing?
Micha’s Song I wanna write a songThat sounds like what you mean to me
Wanna write a song
That sounds like what you mean to me my friendWe both know
These kinds of things don’t happen too much
Love that comes without question
Trust without hesitationAnd if everyone had a little bit of what we have
There would be no war
There would be no strife
I’m tellin you I’m tellin you I’m tellin you
I’m gonna write a song
That sounds like what you mean to me
Wanna write a song
That sounds like what you mean to me my friend
Cause if everyone had a little bit of what we have
There would be no war
There would be no strife
I’m tellin you I’m tellin you I’m tellin you
No more war, no more strife
No more war, no more strife
No more war no more war no more no more
…cause we don’t need no more trouble
We don’t need no more trouble
So I’m gonna write a song
That sounds like what you mean to me
Boston Terror and The Cover-Up President
The only thing more sickening than yesterday’s terrorist attack on Boston is Barak Obama’s response to it, and the knowledge that nothing will really be done unless it is despite this administration. It was a terrorist attack regardless of who is responsible because the terror tactic of bombing – to maim and kill as many as possible – was used. This is not jumping to conclusions as Obama told us we should not do, it is a factual description, one he himself could not bring himself to give yesterday.
It was over three hours from when the bombs went off before our President addressed the nation, mustering as much emotion as if he were folding socks. Let me be clear. We know what to expect from this excuse for a chief executive. His response to terrorist Nadal Hassan’s massacre of unarmed men and women in a gun-free zone while screaming “Allahu Akhbar!!!” was to call it workplace violence. He didn’t want us to jump to conclusions then either. That was a terrorist attack by a Jihadist, a coward too gutless to meet our brave military on the field of battle. That he is still awaiting trial is a national disgrace.
We got a similarly cold and monotone response to that preventable horror of Benghazi where our ambassador and the Americans defending him were brutally tortured and murdered, along with the empty promise that the perps would be brought to justice. We’re still waiting. The fact that some are entertaining the idea that Hilary Clinton could be the 2016 presidential nominee, blood freshly on her hands and arrogant in the face of questions rightly asked of her, is a testament not only to the newly titled “low-information voter,” but the deep extent of the media’s complicity. Today’s voters wouldn’t be nearly so low-info if America’s so-called journalists would do their jobs: report and ask hard questions. They are not doing so with regard to Boston either. To them, Tea Partiers who commit no acts of violence are just as likely suspects as the Jihadists who always use terror. This administration has been cultivating this belief system for many years now. It is perfect Saul Alinsky.
Obama’s flimsy response to terror and violence shouldn’t be a surprise. The college buddy of domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn is quite comfortable with such tactics if they suit his revolutionary ends. He had no chastisement for the property-destroying, flea-infested, anti-Semitic rapists of the Occupy movement. He understood them. He praised the violent and militant uprisings in Egypt that ousted our ally and peace-keeper with Israel, Mubarak. He supported the violent and illegal overthrow of Qaddafi, now replaced by more militant extremists. With such tendencies and sympathies, a stance against terror rings pretty hollow.
Further, Obama has given our enemies – the enemies of freedom worldwide who use terror tactics as a rule – weapons, tanks and planes. He has invited the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood to the White House. He has been silent on their crimes against humanity and those of their home countries, Islamic theocracies that condone the subjugation, mutilation, rape, and murder of women, children and gays. And the media just cannot bring themselves to contrast his sidling up to these monsters while claiming support of gays in America.
What Saul Alinsky taught has chaos at its roots – cause chaos, destroy the system – any system (and any system thereafter – it is a game of perpetual uprising and demolition). How do you do this in a country where the citizens revel in self-reliance, the rule of law, strength and success? You destroy the basis of its strength, starting with the family unit. You say all lifestyles are equal, abortion is a right and label anyone who thinks killing babies is wrong as an extremist. You indoctrinate and control children through government schools – you tell parents it takes a village. You bully and feminize the men who would otherwise lead – you do it in the name of faaaaaaairness. You defame those with a higher faith so that others will not want to ascribe to faith, and they will be more easily controlled. You undermine law enforcement so that people don’t trust cops and assume they are racist and corrupt. You stigmatize the one set of heroes in the population who fights to protect the rest – the military. You tell the people that returning Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are the most likely terrorists so that everyday citizens will fear them. You don’t allow real terrorists to be called what they are. You defend the most violent, racist, misogynistic, homophobic religion on the planet. You call it a religion of peace. You repeal DADT and then anyone harassed or assaulted by his fellow soldier is just a homophobe whose career will soon be over. You put women into combat units where the high standards will have to be lowered to accommodate them, and between the two policies you weaken and dilute the greatest fighting force the world has ever seen. Then you tell the people it is too dangerous for them to be able to defend themselves with guns. You tell them they should give up that right.
And when a bomb hits, who will the people turn to?
Let me be clear. The State, cold and detached much like Obama himself, will be there, dictating, with their press lapdogs telling you terrorism is over and the economy is swell. They will tell you whom to suspect of violence – Tea Partiers who have no record of violence. They will punish you for suspecting Jihadists and their long history of violence.
If we are able to pull through this, if we are able to turn this reality around, it won’t be because of any help from Obama and his administration – it will be in spite of them. It will be because we replace them with better servants of the people. Luckily we are still fighting to keep our Constitutional rights, to preserve life, marriage, family, our livelihoods, we still respect our veterans and law enforcement and we still look to them to protect us. But we are fighting tooth and nail and the outcome is anything but certain.
In Boston yesterday, the emergency responders, law enforcement, the doctors and nurses treating the wounded, and the just-everyday-people who helped those in need, they are the silver rays in this dark scene. Their existence is what shows us that our faith in humanity should still burn bright, that we must keep fighting. My heart breaks for those who lost loved ones, for those who were wounded and suffered the trauma of this attack. I am sick about it. Boston is close to my heart. It was where my mom and grandparents grew up, where my parents met, where my brother was born. I’m glad it didn’t harm more people. I’m praying for all those affected. I’m praying for our country.
I have not lost faith in my fellows or humanity. It is Obama and his administration (and its surrogate, the media) – from whom the rest of the country is supposed to take its cues – that has long since lost my faith. I am hoping that more people are waking up and will help us fight this. As events like the Hassan massacre and its anything-but-swift justice, the Benghazi attack and Obama’s cover-up, and now the Boston Marathon bombing take place, I hope more people will wake as we sound the alarm that tyranny has its hands around our collective throat and we must free ourselves before it is too late.
What Happened to “Never Again”?
Human Rights activist Pamela Geller was scheduled to speak at the Great Neck Synagogue on April 14th until the synagogue’s officials caved to the bully tactics of Islamic bigot Habeeb Ahmed and others who relentlessly threatened and browbeat them should they go through with her speaking engagement. Ahmed’s kind loath open dialogue and ruthlessly vilify anyone who speaks the truth about the violence and extremism so prevalent in Islam.
They vilified Geller and threatened among other things to march against the synagogue. The GNS’s officials could have resisted these threats, they could have championed free speech loudly. They could have weathered that storm and stood courageously, righteously against these present-day Nazis who were trying to deny their first amendment rights. Instead they acquiesced, and now they will never be able to live down their utter spinelessness. As Steve Goldberg so aptly put it, “They have disgraced their congregation, their families and the entire Jewish community.”
Here is the Great Neck Synagogue Executive Committee’s statement:
“As the notoriety and media exposure of the planned program this Sunday have increased, so has the legal liability and potential security exposure of our institution and it’s [sic] member families. In an era of heightened security concerns it is irresponsible to jeopardize the safety of those who call Great Neck Synagogue home, especially our children, even at the risk of diverting attention from a potentially important voice in the ongoing debate. Accordingly, the Great Neck Synagogue Men’s Club will no longer be sponsoring the appearance of Pamela Geller this coming Sunday, and no event will be taking place in our facility.”
The Great Neck Synagogue could have dealt with the harassment and intimidation in any number of ways. Notably, they could have widely publicized it, but instead Geller herself was the one to expose it on her website Atlas Shruggs along with Tom Trento of The United West. In the face of threats to march on the synagogue, they could have rallied the community to band together and stand firmly against the oppression of free speech. They could have counter-protested. If they indeed felt their children were threatened, they could have requested police protection and again, exposed those (illegal) threats publicly.
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch writes:
“[T]he precedent is reinforced that smear campaigns work, and that all the foes of freedom have to do in order to shut down any voices opposed to them is mount a campaign simultaneously vilifying and demonizing their targeted speaker and showing the host the price he will have to pay for featuring the target.”
I have lived and worked in Great Neck and family of mine lived there for nearly their whole lives. It is a very strong community. I can’t help but remember on 9-11 the train station parking lots filled with cars that would never be retrieved by those who worked in the Twin Towers. Great Neck, like many New York City suburbs, was devastated by that terrorist attack. It is shocking that they would capitulate to the terrorist tactic of threatening violence and protest to stifle free speech. On second thought, maybe it isn’t so shocking. Great Neck is also a very liberal community, prone to the fake clichés of diversity, tolerance, and Islam as a religion of peace. Perhaps it is more surprising that they stood against the threats as long as they did. But by surrendering, they have betrayed themselves, each other, and Jews the world over. They have betrayed everyone who has fought to protect and defend their first amendment rights and they have paved the way for more such intimidation to take place.
As Hitler was gathering power and imposing in 1930’s Germany, the Jews and others kept giving their oppressors the benefit of the doubt. They let the Nazis take their weapons, close their businesses, shove them into ghettos. They told themselves it was just temporary. So many didn’t fight back and didn’t realize the mortal threat against them until the camp gates slammed home. Anti-Semitism is more prevalent today than ever. Muslim extremists all over the world proclaim their hatred of the Jews and all freedom-loving peoples, they call daily for the destruction of Israel and the Jews. They teach their children to hate, not to live in peace with their neighbors. They thrash the right to speak freely worldwide, they demand the slaughter of anyone who disagrees with them or speaks out against them. We know their aim. Stopping free speech and open dialog is just the beginning of subjugation. Yielding to their threats while we are still in a free America is reprehensible. Shame on the officials of the Great Neck Synagogue.
You can write to the Great Neck Synagogue at 26 Old Mill Rd. Great Neck, NY 11023
Reflections on Autism Awareness
Dedicated to my mother, father and my brother Josh
April 2nd is “World Autism Day,” and April is Autism Awareness month. From the 1940’s to the 1970s, Autism was a misunderstood set of symptoms associated with schizophrenia and often treated as the result of parental neglect. We certainly have come a long way from routine institutionalization and treatments like LSD and electroshock “therapy.” Today, Autism is understood to be a wide range of essentially neurological conditions. A diagnosis begins broad-brush as ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) and the investigation of possible causes and remedies has become serious and respectable.
My mother knew my brother, Josh, was autistic when he was two years old because in college she had worked in Boston as a volunteer with a brilliant pioneer, Fred Krell. Josh wasn’t correctly diagnosed by the psychiatrists, who were regarded as the go-to experts. They assumed and asserted that Josh’s difficulties were her fault, that she was doing something wrong. Through the 1980’s this was a common “diagnosis.” It was psychiatrist and physician Leo Kanner who wrote in 1949 that autistic children “were left neatly in refrigerators which did not defrost. Their withdrawal seems to be an act of turning away from such a situation to seek comfort in solitude.”[1] This gave rise to the term “Refrigerator mothers” because a mother’s supposed frigidity was thought to be to blame for the Autistic child’s anti-social behavior and inability to communicate like other children. This false stigma was still going strong through the late eighties. Josh wasn’t correctly diagnosed until he was ten, but even so psychiatrists had no remedy or help to offer, and essentially left parents with only one option: he should be institutionalized, if they could afford it. My parents saw how badly kids were treated in such facilities and they set out to do better. And indeed they did.
Josh is a high-functioning Autistic. He is a walking encyclopedia who had read all of Shakespeare by the time he was nine, can look in the sky and tell you what is a planet and what is a star and how far away they are, and what the night sky’s constellations look like – in this or a different season. He knows eighteen languages, eleven of which he taught himself – not including the language he made up to tease me with when we were young. A punishment for him when we were kids was that he could only have two language dictionaries at a time. Luckily for Josh our dad is a college professor and books have always been in profusion in our home. It is fascinating to have a conversation with him, but his different thinking makes it impossible for him to hold down a steady job or live alone without (sometimes near-constant) guidance and supervision.
It wasn’t easy, but because of my parents’ hard work and help from some angel souls along the way like Dr. Kris, who tutored, mentored and befriended Josh, he was able to graduate from high school and college and has a full life of his favorite things – books, writing, painting, walks, the satisfaction of work he can do and a home and community in which he thrives. That community includes HOPE – a group brought together through a local church where special needs kids get together for games and activities and their parents get together for mutual support.
When Josh and I were growing up, there were no Walks for Autism, April was just another month, no one put out blue light-bulbs or wore sky-blue shirts for Autism Speaks’ “Light It Up Blue” for raising Autism awareness. My parents learned everything about raising Josh through trial and error and hard knocks. I know no one stronger or smarter than my mother and father, and anyone who knows the parents of children with special needs understands their heroism. An especially trying facet of raising an Autistic child is that the tendency toward detachment means that no matter how much love and affection he receives, he may never express love and affection for his parents.
Organizations like the Autism Society and Autism Speaks are well intentioned and have done a lot to raise awareness, bring families together and help to mainstream the presence of special needs children. But for years I have noticed that their fundraising is centered on lobbying government for research, creating policy and councils, and to provide programs and services to be funded by taxpayers. This I think is a dead end. Voluntary associations, not government agencies and programs, are far better equipped to help, and people who really want to help are far more likely to deliver it if they can do so in person rather than channeling other people’s money to agencies for distribution. Government agencies also cannot do what the parents of special needs children have been doing all along.
The first incarnation of special needs government policy was the Mental Retardation Facilities Construction Act of 1963 signed by John F. Kennedy. Revised and renamed over the years, it wasn’t until 1987 that the role of the family was even recognized in the bill now known as the Developmental Disabilities Act.
The term “special needs” is a good one because it clarifies what it takes to raise children with disabilities – there is no blanket treatment or program. Every special needs child is different and treatment that works for one often won’t work for another. There’s not even a blanket diagnosis: Autism is now called Autism Spectrum disorder because the degrees vary so greatly. Some Autistics can’t speak or control their movements, some have limited or no speech, some are more sensitive to sound than others. When my brother was little, the sound of rain was to him like machine guns, it would send him screaming and crying as he covered his ears. It was my mother and father who developed the understanding of Josh’s needs – no government program or service could ever do or learn what they did, partly because it took loving parents being with him constantly to understand and treat him. No government agency can replicate parents.
Government programs seem to be the worst investment for families who need help that is individually tailored. The real achievement of associations like Autism Speaks is to bring the families together. I often wonder whether the hundreds of thousands of dollars raised by events like the Walk for Autism would be better spent by being given directly to families or by establishing private programs.
All government service programs cannot care for people the way individuals and private voluntary associations can. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid are all bankrupt, fraud-ridden, out of date, and in need of massive overhauls. Foster care is an atrocity because it pays people for housing children; an agency can’t hold them accountable if they do not actually raise the children because no agency can pay them to do what a parent does. Like the Visa ad says, that is priceless. Public schools – capital “F” Failed. Why entrust those with special needs to the people who fail to educate all the children who don’t have special needs? It makes no real sense for these families to turn to the entity that not only fails at everything it does, but wastes billions of tax-payer dollars doing it.
Every aspect for which the organizations lobby government could be done privately. The couple who founded Autism Speaks, Bob and Suzanne Wright, earned their wealth in the private sector and used it to develop the non-profit because their grandson is Autistic. This is how all charities and services used to come about. The nation’s first hospital was founded by private citizens Benjamin Franklin and Dr. Thomas Bond and still stands in Pennsylvania. Carnegie Hall, the Empire State building, all the nation’s original colleges, even Central Park and the Brooklyn Bridge came from individuals in the private sector.
I don’t in any way mean to malign the efforts of these organizations. I have put that puzzle piece magnet on my car, I’ve done the Walk for Autism in years past. It is wonderful to have these non-profits bringing families together, connecting them to vital resources and information to help them on the journey. Today’s parents of special needs children don’t have the uphill climb that my parents did, they don’t have to figure everything out themselves. That is the real accomplishment of these organizations, bringing our greatest resources – each other – together.
[1] Kanner L (1949). “Problems of nosology and psychodynamics in early childhood autism”. Am J Orthopsychiatry 19 (3): 416–26.
Gun Control 2.0: You’re Crazy ‘Cause I Said So, Now Hand Over Your Guns
Bloomberg reports today that in California they are seizing guns from formerly legal gun owners who no longer qualify to own them because of criminal charges or commitment to a mental hospital. Taking guns from criminals? Good. Taking guns from the mentally ill and unstable? Also good, since they make up 99.9% of those who have committed mass murder with guns in the United States. But with a government that is pushing for increasing measures to disarm citizens and Obamacare in control of medicine, how long before the sane gun-owning citizens are deemed mentally unstable in the name of gun control?
According to the article, Lynette Phillips was the subject of such a gun seizure due to a two-day involuntary commitment to a mental hospital. The alarming part is her assertion that, “the nurse who admitted her had exaggerated the magnitude of her condition.” Now, we don’t know the circumstances, why she was thought to be crazy or what behavior made the nurse think Phillips should be committed. And of course, the crazy don’t think they’re crazy. If one is involuntarily committed, one has an opportunity to contest the decision before a judge, but it is permanently on the record. But this raises an important question because judgments on another person’s sanity are made by individuals – fallible, subjective humans. Those individuals make a determination nearly impossible to disprove that now affects one’s Constitutional right to own a firearm.
Under Obamacare doctors, nurses and other medical staff are no longer beholden to their patients, they are beholden to The State. It holds the taxpayer-funded purse that allocates budgets and it controls the standards and directives by which medical staff and facilities must operate. If doctors and nurses answer to the State, and the State wants to enact gun control, what’s to stop them from dictating judgments of insanity for those they want to disarm? A doctor’s job, a hospital’s budget might depend on compliance with, for example, a new directive on what behavior indicates insanity or potential future violence. Do you oppose this Administration’s policies? You may be hostile. You may be a danger to yourself or others. The Administration certainly thinks so, and now they write the doctor’s checks.
The idea of a doctor asking a patient the question “Are there any guns in your house?” was raised after the Sandy Hook massacre when Obama proposed 23 executive orders to limit the use of guns. Of these order 16 states, “…the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes,” and according to the White House fact sheet on the orders, “…no federal law prevents health care providers from warning law enforcement authorities about threats of violence.” Obama wants doctors to be able to get information on the firearms one owns, and under Obamacare he also controls the staff who diagnose things like mental stability and illness.
We know that gun ownership and conservative values overlap heavily across the United States. With the help and compliance of the mass media this Administration has tried to defame and marginalize anyone who opposes its policies and doesn’t agree with its ideology. We also know whom the government deems to be a threat – the new Enemy of the People. It’s not Islamic terrorists who scream “Allahu Akhbar” as they murder innocent civilians. Those are the justified “freedom fighters” of the “religion of peace.” Janet Napolitano’s Department of Homeland “Security” has said that all returning Veterans are potential terrorists, that those who are against aborting babies are extremists, and we all know how they characterize the Tea Party in particular and conservatives in general. Now they have ubiquitous control over the medical staff to dole out judgments of insanity. What better way to further nullify your enemy than to declare them crazy – one gun-clinger at a time?
Sequestration: Say Goodbye to Our First Line of Defense
Between Leon Panetta’s unconstitutional order that combat units be opened to women and impending Sequestration this week, America can kiss goodbye its military superiority and ability to fight wars effectively. As readiness goes, so goes our security both at home and abroad.
Under Sequestration, equipment isn’t the only thing on the chopping block. Personnel will be as well, and all will have to prove their value in the positions they hold or want to hold. With the conflicting directives of cutting fat vs. compliance with female quotas in the combat units, it is qualified and experienced men who will be purged first. Combined with the inevitably lowered standards in these units to accommodate women, it is combat readiness that will suffer the most.
The top military brass is already under pressure to show diversity and prove it doesn’t discriminate. Indeed, that is now its foremost mandate, not military readiness. With the repeal of laws barring women from combat units and special forces, they will now be forced to prove they’re giving women a “fair” shake by discriminating against more qualified men, since no comprehensive testing was done to prove women can make it through their training, and the only two we know of who attempted such, two in the Marine Infantry Officer course, failed in the first day and the first week of training respectively. It won’t matter that the women can’t make those standards that most of the top men in every branch can’t achieve.
It will go something like this at the officer level: “Suzy-Q failed the training? You’re up for promotion, aren’t you? Take another look at Suzy-Q.” And from DOD to the top brass: “We expect X% pass rate for females. Anything less will be seen as discrimination. Next year’s budget will reflect the success of this program. Understood?” The military will have to lower the standards of its toughest units in order to fill quotas of women to show they’re not discriminating.
Cutting spending is vital for every department of government, including the military. The Marines have always been in the lead when it comes to working with the least, then cutting even more. With so many other ways to cut the excess – from non-vital programs like the National Endowment for the Arts to stopping the fraud and waste so pervasive in government programs from Social Security to Medicare – Sequestration is totally unnecessary. But this was Obama’s idea, and it put the military in the cross-hairs from the start. It’s easy to see why. This administration thinks the military is too masculine, too white, too conservative, too straight. They’ve repealed DADT, opened the toughest units to women who can’t make it through one week of their training and sold our equipment to our enemies. This is just the next phase in destroying the last bastion of merit and strength our country has against enemies both foreign and domestic.



