-
Recent Posts
- House Bill 786 – Defection of the Rank and File Exposes Short Shrift for Citizens
- An Open Letter to Senator Richard Burr
- Dear Gang of 8
- Boston Thrives and Terror Will Never Prevail!
- Boston Terror and The Cover-Up President
- What Happened to “Never Again”?
- Reflections on Autism Awareness
- Persuasion, Not Pandering
- Gun Control 2.0: You’re Crazy ‘Cause I Said So, Now Hand Over Your Guns
- Sequestration: Say Goodbye to Our First Line of Defense
- No Toddler Left Behind Means Younger Government-Controlled Children
- Let The Men Be Heroes – Because They Are
- Women in Combat Units Vs. The Military’s Sexual Assault Problem
- Careerists v. Mother Nature
- The Problem(s) of Women in Combat
- The Mental Pretzel of Gun Control
- Between Feminism and Gun Control, Women Are Screwed
- Wanted: A New Tailor for the Emperor
- Contrasts: Liars Ramble, the Truth is Simple
- To Teach the Children
Political Animal
Archives
February 17th, 2013 at 5:28 pm
Re: Your article, Women in Combat – Part 3. Great series and you are spot on. I keep re-reading one sentence, however, trying to rationalize what you mean. The second paragraph (third to the last sentence) discusses “separating” men from women doesn’t empower them.
February 17th, 2013 at 8:29 pm
“what The Invisible War shows without intending to is that breaking down the age-old standards of behavior and of separating women from men doesn’t empower them – it makes them more vulnerable to attack.”