Category Archives: Uncategorized

House Bill 786 – Defection of the Rank and File Exposes Short Shrift for Citizens

The below is an open letter to Warren committee members in North Carolina that was shared with me to post.
“To:     thom.tillis@ncleg.net, phil.berger@ncleg.net
Cc:     jonathan.jordan@ncleg.net, chuck.mcgrady@ncleg.net, john.faircloth@ncleg.net, rick.glazier@ncleg.net, pat.hurley@ncleg.net, mickey.michaux@ncleg.net, Paul.Stam@ncleg.net, rob.bryan@ncleg.net, debra.conrad@ncleg.net, leo.daughtry@ncleg.net, valerie.foushee@ncleg.net, joe.queen@ncleg.net, bobbie.richardson@ncleg.net
Subject: House Bill 786 – Defection of the Rank and File Exposes Short Shrift for Citizens
Committee Members-

   Section 9 has to be one of the finest examples of bait and switch that I have witnessed at the NCGA. Wrapped up by the Republican House leadership and gifted to the legal voting taxpayers as a “law enforcement safety measure.”  An ‘It’s Good for You’ gift!
   An unnamed ‘do gooder’ Sheriff meets with the Warren Committee and insists that he must ID the illegals in his small county. (Que Pasa  points due north to DC.)  Albeit, all criminal court calendars ID the offenders. The NCSA leadership concurs with the rogue Sheriff, but …….the rank and file defects with a ‘no go’ vote. Wallah, no official statement of public support. There goes  “this is a law enforcement tool” sales pitch. Poof…the bait is exposed.
   Enter House Speaker Thom Tillis’ legal counsel…now, what vested interest could a former AG attorney have in a law enforcement measure? Concerned enough to make a hard sell to law abiding citizen activists who aren’t quite accepting the validity of this ‘driving permit which isn’t a license.’  A “new tool” for law enforcement.  A “got to have” in the belt.
   Peeling away the law enforcement Christmas wrapping, we get to the real ‘switch’ gift.   IIlegal labor driving legally to illegal employment.  A new ‘legal’ NC subclass of non-citizens working under the table, producing fake ID for the I-9, and driving up unemployment rates, all with a valid NC license. Gratis House Republicans. It can only get better
   Buried in this 25 page bill is  f, g, h  of Section 8.  Ominous drum roll…..a new exception has been created. A ‘non’ employee emerges with a ‘get out of jail’ license-work permit. Comes with a built in employment guarantee of no prosecution for employers. A real steal. An E-Verify exemption benefiting both the new non-citizen employee and his employer. All wrapped up with the licensing “permit” to purportedly identify illegals and make “We the People” safer on North Carolina highways. Nifty. The NC House Republican gold card of licenses has thwarted the legal hiring system while gifting law enforcement with a “reduction in paperwork”  all while duping the public into believing this is in their best interest. Job well done.
  The watering down of the hard fought and deservedly earned HB36 E-Verify Job Protection for Citizens bill has been delivered. Not only is a portion chiseled away, but the privilege of driving has been comped at the further expense of citizen jobs and E-Verify accountability.  The legalization of illegal workers for all practical purposes. Gratis of a new class of driver’s license and embedded NC employer perks.  An NC Republican House nod for the illegal hiring of illegal aliens. An underhanded circumvention of the current E-Verify law. Not applicable to the average taxpaying citizen employer or employer. Feel left out? Well you are.
  And, we the law abiding taxpaying citizens, actually have the nerve to be upset by this duplicity. Not pleased by what we have been ‘re-gifted?’ A little too quick to point out the obvious of this short sale?  Not grateful enough?
  Gotcha!
  Shame on all of you.
- An all too wise and not too grateful taxpaying voting NC resident.”

An Open Letter to Senator Richard Burr

April 23, 2013

Senator Burr,

On April 11th, to our dismay, you joined 15 other Republicans in a vote to proceed on the Reid gun legislation (S 649) inappropriately named the “Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013.” As we know, procedural votes are policy votes and one should never bring bad bills to the floor by voting for a motion to proceed.  So, In other words, why would you vote to proceed on a bad bill so you can then vote against it?

 It only makes sense if you are trying to have it both ways.  You stated:  

“To be clear from the outset, I do not support S. 649, nor do I support the Manchin-Toomey background check amendment.  The vote yesterday was not on the specifics of these bills or whether they should be filibustered; rather, the vote was solely about whether we should begin a debate in the Senate on the issue.  Since the leadership of the Senate agreed to unlimited debate and amendments, I believed it was important that the Senate at least have an open discussion.  However, it is important to remember that S. 649, amendments to it, and any other gun control measures that come before the Senate are still subject to the filibuster, as well as up-or-down votes.”

Sir, as you know, the debate on the 2nd Amendment was settled over 200 years ago.  There is no need for this Congress to have an “open discussion”.  Stating you do not support S 649 now is a little too late.  We wouldn’t even need to be writing this letter if you and 16 fellow Republicans hadn’t advanced the Reid gun control legislation. In addition the undersigned are further dismayed you would have cast this vote in light of all the times we contacted your office and your staff has always assured us you would never support any infringement of our 2nd Amendment rights and in fact, had even signed onto a filibuster of the Reid legislation.

To be clear, lawmakers will not get a pass on any vote that allows a bad bill to proceed that will infringe on the constitutional rights of the American people. Your vote has made this a very real possibility.

Therefore, the undersigned are requesting a teleconference/Twitter town hall in the next few days at a date and time of your convenience.  We would love to have ½ hour of your time to ask you questions about this issue. Please reply to either Mary Ann or Virginia directly with your date and time. 

Respectfully,

Virginia A. Quaglia, OIB, NC

Mary Ann McCarthy, Southport, NC

 

Joined by:

Citizens for Constitutional Liberties (Wayne County Tea)

Roanoke Valley Patriots

Tea Party Patriots of Jackson County

Moore Tea Citizens

Crystal Coast Tea Party of Carteret County

Asheville Tea Party PAC

Haywood 9/12

Surry County Tea Party

NC Tea Party Coalition

Western NC Tea

Cherokee County 9/12

Dr. Dan’s Freedom Forum

Catawba Valley Tea Party

Stand Up NC of Iredell County

We The People of Brunswick County

Feet to the Fire


Dear Gang of 8

There should be no discussion whatsoever about changing or amending immigration policy without first securing our border, enforcing current immigration law, and implementing E-verify.  The Boston Marathon bombing perfectly illustrates why we should insist that our borders be secured and our immigration policy vigorously enforced. Our borders are wide open and we all know it.  You have no idea who the millions of illegal immigrants in this country are:  You don’t know why they came, where they’ve been, what they bring with them.  You haven’t asked each and every one of them.  Our current immigration process does just that – so the United States knows that when an immigrant has become a citizen, his background has been checked for criminal records, his blood checked for communicable diseases, his financial records checked for stability, his knowledge of the country, its laws, and his reasons for being here committed to record.  My husband went through that process and became a citizen, it’s not that hard!

The millions who go through that process have declared that they want to be citizens and they obeyed our laws so that they too could be protected by those laws.  Many fled from countries where they didn’t have such protection.  The last idea our representatives should be entertaining is to pile millions of illegal immigrants – who didn’t want to bother with our legal process – on top of the millions who did.  This is already an overburdened process.  How much extra taxpayer funded staff will have to be added to field the paperwork of all the new Amnesty recipients?  How many legal immigrants’ cases will be slowed and pushed aside for illegals to get a cheap ticket at the front?  Why should law-breakers be rewarded?  Why should law-abiding legal immigrants be so slighted?

You should demand that every inch of our border is protected, fenced, surveiled and patrolled.  You should oppose illegal immigrants being given any tax-payer funded services or driver’s licenses which are magnets drawing them here.  You should demand the implementation of E-verify.  This obvious and peaceful solution will have illegals returning to their countries of origin on their own.  The interest of Big Businesses who want cheap labor are not more important than the safety of every citizen and the livelihoods of citizens out of work in Obama’s horrible economy.  You should demand the implementation of voter ID – stand against those who are nullifying the votes of legal citizens with their fraud.  Give these three to five years to work before discussing any Amnesty policy.

The anti-gun bill was killed this week.  People know that where crazy people commit mass shootings and crazy Jihadists commit mass bombings, we need to be able to protect ourselves every single day.  The best defense against both threats are law-abiding gun-owners exercising their right to bear arms, and the government and criminals shouldn’t be the only ones with guns.  Your Amnesty bill should fail for similar reasons because it’s not just terrorists that are a concern.  In my home of North Carolina there are dozens and dozens of crimes committed every month by illegal aliens.  They are drunk drivers, rapists, molesters, batterers and murderers.  We know about the government’s catch-and-release policy.  We know of all the criminals who were released, supposedly in preparation for Obama’s Sequestration.  The purpose of the government is to protect its citizens and part of that is securing our borders and enforcing the law.  It’s obvious, we all know it, every country does it and there’s nothing racially charged or unfair about it.  Stop the push for Amnesty!


Boston Thrives and Terror Will Never Prevail!

Updated 4/19…now that we know the bombers were…wait for it….MUSLIM TERRORISTS!…

Boston Thrives updates

Boston Thrives updates

BOSTON THRIVES by Jude Eden

BOSTON THRIVES by Jude Eden

Last night I was playing music with my buddy Jeff, the other half of our cello-guitar duo Upstarts & Rogues.  I had been thinking about Boston and a couple of songs that I wrote after the  9-11 attacks.  One of them is on our new record, Twain Shall Meet, called “Micha’s Song.”   As I write on the description, “I originally wrote this song back in 2002 to my best friend.  The Towers had been attacked and everything had changed, we were still trying to make sense of what had happened.  I was looking at two halves of a circle – love and death.  I dreamed that if everyone could know that kind of solidity and warmth, complete love and trust, there would be no desire for suicide bombing, mass shootings, war.  But there is always someone who wants to kill and destroy, and as I sing “no more war, no more strife” it is a plea however naive – to the suicide bombers, to the mass-shooters…No more!  And coming back in the end to that friendship…”

And as we practiced last night I sang, and sang “no more bombings…no more terror…no more bombs! until I crumpled into sobs.  How can someone do such a thing? 

Micha’s Song
I wanna write a song
That sounds like what you mean to me
Wanna write a song
That sounds like what you mean to me my friendWe both know
These kinds of things don’t happen too much
Love that comes without question
Trust without hesitationAnd if everyone had a little bit of what we have
There would be no war
There would be no strife
I’m tellin you I’m tellin you I’m tellin you

I’m gonna write a song
That sounds like what you mean to me
Wanna write a song
That sounds like what you mean to me my friend

Cause if everyone had a little bit of what we have
There would be no war
There would be no strife
I’m tellin you I’m tellin you I’m tellin you
No more war, no more strife
No more war, no more strife
No more war no more war no more no more
…cause we don’t need no more trouble
We don’t need no more trouble

So I’m gonna write a song
That sounds like what you mean to me


Gun Control 2.0: You’re Crazy ‘Cause I Said So, Now Hand Over Your Guns

Bloomberg reports today that in California they are seizing guns from formerly legal gun owners who no longer qualify to own them because of criminal charges or commitment to a mental hospital.  Taking guns from criminals? Good.  Taking guns from the mentally ill and unstable?  Also good, since they make up 99.9% of those who have committed mass murder with guns in the United States.  But with a government that is pushing for increasing measures to disarm citizens and Obamacare in control of medicine, how long before the sane gun-owning citizens are deemed mentally unstable in the name of gun control?

According to the article, Lynette Phillips was the subject of such a gun seizure due to a two-day involuntary commitment to a mental hospital.  The alarming part is her assertion that, “the nurse who admitted her had exaggerated the magnitude of her condition.”  Now, we don’t know the circumstances, why she was thought to be crazy or what behavior made the nurse think Phillips should be committed.  And of course, the crazy don’t think they’re crazy.  If one is involuntarily committed, one has an opportunity to contest the decision before a judge, but it is permanently on the record.  But this raises an important question because judgments on another person’s sanity are made by individuals – fallible, subjective humans.  Those individuals make a determination nearly impossible to disprove that now affects one’s Constitutional right to own a firearm.

Under Obamacare doctors, nurses and other medical staff are no longer beholden to their patients, they are beholden to The State.  It holds the taxpayer-funded purse that allocates budgets and it controls the standards and directives by which medical staff and facilities must operate.  If doctors and nurses answer to the State, and the State wants to enact gun control, what’s to stop them from dictating judgments of insanity for those they want to disarm?  A doctor’s job, a hospital’s budget might depend on compliance with, for example, a new directive on what behavior indicates insanity or potential future violence.  Do you oppose this Administration’s policies?  You may be hostile.  You may be a danger to yourself or others.  The Administration certainly thinks so, and now they write the doctor’s checks.

The idea of a doctor asking a patient the question “Are there any guns in your house?” was raised after the Sandy Hook massacre when Obama proposed 23 executive orders to limit the use of guns.  Of these order 16 states, “…the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes,” and according to the White House fact sheet on the orders, “…no federal law prevents health care providers from warning law enforcement authorities about threats of violence.”  Obama wants doctors to be able to get information on the firearms one owns, and under Obamacare he also controls the staff who diagnose things like mental stability and illness.

We know that gun ownership and conservative values overlap heavily across the United States.  With the help and compliance of the mass media this Administration has tried to defame and marginalize anyone who opposes its policies and doesn’t agree with its ideology. We also know whom the government deems to be a threat – the new Enemy of the People.  It’s not Islamic terrorists who scream “Allahu Akhbar” as they murder innocent civilians. Those are the justified “freedom fighters” of the “religion of peace.”  Janet Napolitano’s Department of Homeland “Security” has said that all returning Veterans are potential terrorists, that those who are against aborting babies are extremists, and we all know how they characterize the Tea Party in particular and conservatives in general.  Now they have ubiquitous control over the medical staff to dole out judgments of insanity.  What better way to further nullify your enemy than to declare them crazy – one gun-clinger at a time?


Wanted: A New Tailor for the Emperor

Victory is sweet, and the first presidential debate of 2012 was wonderfully instructive for so many reasons, most of all for showcasing Obama’s utter lack of talent and intelligence.

If Obama was as charismatic and brilliant as his followers and the media have hammered into us that he is, shouldn’t he have been able to master that debate and turned it to his favor with ease?  Without the media’s protection, both their refusal to ask him difficult questions or call him on his dismal record, and their gushing praise over his every syllable without criticism, Obama can’t perform.  He isn’t even as adept as Slick Willy himself on the stage.

Those poor Obama believers.  They thought he was brilliant, that he could save the world, lower the sea levels, conquer enemy Republicans with one hand tied behind his back.  They thought nothing could ruffle him, that he was just so talented all he had to do was exist and he would triumph.  But The Force, alas, is not with Barry after all.

Rose-colored glasses are shattering and it’s like watching a religious cult realize their leader is a fraud, or watching the shock of realizing what your favorite model looks like in sweats without makeup.  He sold them dreams from his father…or not.

Genius, like un-airbrushed beauty, is rare.  Watching the man who proclaimed himself a genius melt into a puddle of frothy indignation and embarrassment?  Oooohhh so satisfying.   The debate was a reveal for many wearing those glasses, but it just exposed the obvious to those of us who’ve been paying attention.  We’ve been opposing his terrible policies and unconstitutional power-grabs.  I personally have thought his speeches are vacuous, not awe-inspiring.  We’ve always known Obama was a puppet propped up and made over by a pampering, super-indulgent media and supporters.  Now a few more people realize it too.

Though his helpers in the news rooms are already working to change the story, they can’t take back the utter coming-apart-at-the-seams that occurred post-debate, where even the likes of Chris Matthews admitted Obama was an utter flop.  Even the race-card can’t be played here – will they try to say that anyone who saw what a complete failure Obama was is a racist?  They can make up all sorts of excuses, but the people saw Obama for what he is: a fake.

Obama and his ilk have been fooling some of the people most of the time, but all of the people can watch the debates!

aristotle_000


The Left & the Wrong Side of History

In the buildup to World War II, many in Europe thought that the Nazi ideas of socialism could work, and that Hitler was a charismatic leader who meant them no harm.  Churchill was called a warmonger for his stance that Germany should not be able to arm and for his opposition to Hitler’s demonization of the Jews.  Hitler painted himself as an advocate for peace, even as he was drawing plans to take over Europe and exterminate the Jews.  After surviving the first World War, many were justifiably loathe to enter into another.  They didn’t want to believe that another war was impending, or that one rogue nation wanted to take over, subjugate and purge all the others.  They were soon to see how wrong they were.

1941 Anti-war poster

Anti-war advocates are apt to acknowledge that we had to fight the Nazis, and yet today cannot acknowledge that there are still the same legitimate reasons to fight real enemies of freedom.  During and after WWII, both conscientious objectors and Nazi sympathizers would have to answer to their unwillingness to fight or their sympathy toward the murderous enemy.  “Conscies” were often stigmatized in their communities, and Nazi sympathizers rightly treated with outright anger and disdain.

Hitler claimed to be offering solutions to the downtrodden, to be an advocate for peace and progress.  His actions showed that he was really a bloodthirsty dictator intent on being the head of a new master race.  Some saw him for what he was, the Nazis for what they were, but others said there was no threat.

History will look back on 21st century and see, as many do today, that Ahmadinejad and jihadists are the Hitler and Nazis of our time.  Just so, all those who fail to stand against them, and more who defend Islam as a religion of peace will be seen like the Nazi sympathizers of World War II.  Our president and the Left are those sympathizers today.

Just as Hitler and the Nazis demonized the Jews as the cause of Germany’s economic woes, so Obama and his party demonize the entrepreneurs and any Republican or Conservative as evil and the source of our financial crises and social injustice.  And just as the Nazis came up with all sorts of lies and distortions to paint Jews as evil and inferior, so Obama and his party have tried to paint, whites, the wealthy and Christians (and Jews) as hateful, corrupt and backwards.

1930s Union Pledge Peace poster

The future will look back on the early 21st century and see that while Liberals claimed to be for peace, they said nothing if the president making war was in their own party.  They will see that no matter how much Ahmadinejad proclaimed his genocidal intentions, the Left ignored him, just as Hitler’s words were ignored until it was too late, the bombs were already falling and the troops were already marching.

The future will see that just as Churchill was demonized as a warmonger for opposing Hitler and Chamberlain was championed as a broker of peace, the early 21st century Left attacked those who were fighting for freedom and human rights against child-raping, suicide-bombing Islamists, soldiers even punished for fighting that fight, while Obama is lauded as some kind of peacemaker though he has done nothing to but disempower the United States and her allies to fight the real warmongers of our time.

They will see that while the Left claimed to be for women’s rights in particular and human rights in general, they studiously ignored the women and children who were subjugated, abused, raped, had acid thrown in their faces, and murdered according to the faith of Islam.

But History will see the Left as fools and hypocrites for much more than their defense of Islam in America and their claim that the US is the cause of Islamofascism.

The future will look back and see that while the Left claimed to be for the poor, they did everything they could to stop cheap and efficient energy production while forcing the world into inefficient and expensive energy sources that only the rich could afford.  And while their party controlled all branches of government, the whole economy continued its steep decline.

They will see that while the Left claimed to be against corruption and crony capitalism, their president favored his wealthy donors and tax evaders with cabinet and other political positions, gave billions to favored Big businesses and presided over the least transparent administration in the country’s history.

They’ll see that while the Left claimed to be against bullying, they had no problem with voter intimidation by groups like the New Black Panthers, and they had no problem bullying even children who criticized the president’s policies.

WWII Anti-Christian Nazi poster

They will see that though the Left claimed to want the “separation of church and state,” they had nothing to say about the Middle Eastern theocracies, nor the increasing drive toward implementing Sharia, Islam’s religious law, in America.  The future looking back will wonder how the Left could not oppose opening with the Islamic jummah prayer at the Democrat National Convention.  And while giving extremist Muslism a pass, the Left viciously attacked Christianity, the religion of “turn the other cheek,” whose followers gave the most to help the poor and destitute.

As the future looks back on a scene like the Code Pink group absurdly protesting the Grand Old Party’s convention, they’ll wonder why the Pinkers didn’t go to a local Islamic center or the Democrat National Convention and sing their song about “where all the world has human rights.”

They will see that though the Left screamed about the intrusive wire-tapping of the  Patriot Act during the Bush years, they had nothing to say when Obama continued that same wire-tapping, and went further by taking away the citizens’ rights of habeas corpus.

They will see that though the Left mouthed the words of equal rights to life, liberty and happiness, they fought fiercely to ensure that women could deny their babies those rights, killing them at any stage of pregnancy and even after birth, and studiously ignored the Islamic theocracies that kill gays as a rule.

Obama bows to Saudi King, 2009

But this is 2012, where the Dalai Llama and the president of Israel, the tiny Democracy in the Middle East are made to go through the back door of the White House while our president bows to and kisses the hands of dictators and welcomes the Muslim Brotherhood into the Oval office.  The Muslim Brotherhood, who in Egypt recently tried to pass law based on the Quran that would allow men to have sex with their dead wives.

This is 2012, where the president’s followers adore him like a cult leader.  Just as Hitler was charismatic and persuasive, so is Obama, and just as some thought Nazi ideas of socialism should work, so does the Left today.  I’m not saying that Obama is a murderous dictator.  That position is squarely held by Ahmadinejad.  The future will see Obama more like the fool Chamberlain, a man who got the peace prize though he did nothing to earn it, a man who mouthed platitudes about peace who did nothing to stop war and everything to weaken his country to fight a bloodthirsty, anti-humanitarian enemy.

It doesn’t matter how corrupt Obama is, how many lobbyists he grants positions of political leadership to, how much he divides the country, how he supports those who subjugate women and children, how many people lose their homes and jobs and go on food stamps, or how many lies he tells.  The followers still bend their minds into pretzels justifying him.

Thankfully, a lot of folks are waking from their zombie fog.  They’re looking at their own bottom line, comparing what Obama said yesterday to what he says and does today.  They see that they’re not better off, that race relations are worse than ever in most of our lifetimes, that Obama is dividing and destroying the country.

For those who remain unconvinced, or twist their minds into pretzels convincing themselves that the clean-as-a-whistle Romney-Ryan duo is somehow worse, there is no hope.  They won’t be persuaded, they have to be defeated, just like Nazi’s and their sympathizers.


Reflections on the Marine Corps in the 3rd Year

8/20/2007

What’s a gal like you doing in a place like this?  It sounds facetious, but I get asked this all the time.  When I enlisted in the Marine Corps three and a half years ago, I was 26, a newlywed, and had been living pretty well.  A full-time product and portrait  photographer, working and performing with other artists and musicians, living in a house by the sea…I had it pretty good and I was a total bohemian.  Unbelievably to many, a conservative bohemian.  I was living in New York after photography school when the Towers were attacked.  I knew immediately that this meant war.  I believe in fighting the violent jihadists that want to dominate the world.  But it was another couple of years before I joined the Marines.  By the time I joined I was tired of my own crowd of anti-war liberals, the bulk of my compatriots in the art and music worlds.  I wanted to be a part of a truly diverse organization, one that doesn’t have to use quotas to get people of every color, creed, and background (although, being an arm of the government, they do have some imposed quotas).  I wanted to use more than just a modicum of my capabilities on a given day and I wanted to stretch my limits.  Most of all, I wanted to contribute to the world around me, and be a part of what I see as an institution that makes a difference for the better.  What I got was that and more.

I chose the Marines because it was by well-deserved reputation the most difficult.  I wanted a place where more was demanded of me, more was expected of me.  I wanted to be around other people who wanted the same challenges.  I wanted to deploy and see the war in Iraq with my own eyes, to help the women and children there who enjoy so little freedom and prosperity compared to us in free countries.  I enlisted rather than becoming an officer because I thought it would make me a more well-rounded leader.

I’ve met people I never would have had reason to meet, been to places I wouldn’t have been able to go, worked through situations I would not have thought possible, and benefited in ways I could not have anticipated.  It has humbled and strengthened me.

My deployment to Fallujah in 2005 was the most rewarding experience I’ve had.  I’m a data dink, 0651, and we supported communications out there, but I was also assigned to stand female checkpoint duty on the outskirts of the city with several other females from different units.  I was able to have basic conversation with the Iraqis with the rudimentary Arabic class offered by the Marine Corps.  Some women were timid, others indifferent, many delightful.  Those who know some English are very proud of the fact.  At first, not knowing what to expect I was stunned by those who would say, “You are our sister, please be careful,” or “We are glad you’re here,” or simply “God bless you,” kissing our cheeks.  Some children, seeing us in all our very alien-looking gear would cry at the site of us.  Others would ask us for things, or proudly hold out their hands and brandish the one English phrase they knew: “Mista! Mista!  Chocolate!”

Working with the Infantry Marines was also a big part of this duty.  These men truly have the toughest job and the toughest living conditions.  They are dedicated to each other and to their families, and bear the difficulties with a great strength that often goes unrecognized by the majority.  In addition to their regular duties at the checkpoints, they made sure we had everything we needed.  They were even our big-brothers-on-call around the the Iraqi Police and Army with whom we worked daily – all of whom want to marry us.  It didn’t seem to matter how many stories I made up (in my novice Arabic) about having a gaggle children, two of whom were red-headed, blue-eyed twin boys.  No amount of detail convinced them I was unavailable.

It hasn’t been easy.  In fact, it’s been one of the hardest things I’ve ever done.  The Marine Corps is not for the faint of heart.  It is hard on the body, it’s challenging for the will and the ego, and it’s very hard on marriage and relationships.  Joining up is an easy decision to make, but not as easy to live with.

I’m blessed with a strong and loving family, and a wonderful husband who’s just as stubborn as I am.


Checkpoint Duty on the Outskirts of Fallujah, 2005

They Call us Angels

The Last Month of Female ECP Duty

LCpl Jude Eden, Alpha Co. Data Plt.

11/15/2005

Ever since war in Iraq became a consideration for our administration, careful attention has been paid to respecting the culture of those we are trying to help.  While engaging in combat to facilitate self government for the Iraqi people, we have all heard the phrase “winning hearts and minds.”  In light of the unique dynamic between men and women in Middle Eastern culture (namely that a man does not interact, let alone touch, a woman that is not his wife or in his family), female Marines have been tasked with Entry Check Point duty searching the Iraqi females who come into the city of Fallujah.  Now this duty is in the hands of Iraqi females who have been trained at 29 Palms, and October was the last month for Marines to have this opportunity.

For the entire month we started and finished our days with convoys through the city to each of the 5 check points.  We got to know our convoy Marines – the men from RCT8 who risked their lives daily to get us to and from each destination.  We got to know the infantry Marines who live at the ECPs – men from 2/6 who have the very difficult job of maintaining security at the checkpoints and, with limited help from an interpreter, managing the Iraqi Police, Army, and detainees.  While we’re pretty spoiled here with running water, chow halls and a PX, they use bottled water to shave and shower and rely on other units to bring them hot chow once or twice a day.  They hope they get some goodies they can use and enjoy in the mail.  We often came bearing PX bags full of things they couldn’t get for themselves.  We also made use of our job skills and other knowledge.  One day the generator at ECP 1 broke down, and LCpl Rodriguez (Engineers) provided expertise to get them up and running again.  When the Polaris at ECP 3 needed fixing, LCpl Erhardt (Motor T) brought out tools and materials and fixed it for them.  They also had some computer issues, and I (Data) was ready to help solve the problem.  Since many Marines speak little to no Arabic, my training in SLAC (Survival Language Arabic Course) also came in very handy.

Interacting with the Iraqis was an unforgettable experience.  Often funny, sometimes frustrating, we handled everything from women with open-topped boxes of live chickens to men who wanted us to be one of their 4 wives.  Many were very grateful and impressed with our efforts to speak Arabic to them.  Sometimes a mother would lift her toddler to us to give a kiss on the cheek.  Children would come through, fascinated with us, and every so often one would extend an outstretched palm and say, “Mista!  Mista!  Chocolate!”  Most gratifying were the times when an English speaking woman would offer thanks and good wishes for our safety, saying, “America is our friend.  Be careful and be safe here,” or “You are our sister.”  All of us have stories, though not all are pleasant.  There was the day infantry Marines engaged in a foot pursuit of a man on their target list who was dressed as a female.  One day a mortar went off well within sight, and it was a little while before we determined that the Marine on post was okay, but an Iraqi policeman had been killed.  Another morning a grenade was thrown at us one our way to ECP 2, but thankfully landed between the trucks and didn’t harm anyone.

I am grateful I was able to participate in the ECP duty experience.  Being a Data Marine, I otherwise wouldn’t have had the opportunity to go outside the wire and see what’s really happening out there.  I felt a strong sense of purpose because I was able to connect the cause of promoting Iraqi independence with the necessary work and the people themselves.  I was able to see something of what their lives are like – their vivaciousness, their frustration, even their sadness.  It not only made me appreciative of what we have in America, it reaffirmed my belief in our goal here.  It was worthwhile getting to know the Iraqis, infantry Marines, and the interpreters.  Most rewarding was being able to get to know my fellow female Marines, whom I found to be bright, high-spirited, confident and generous.  Leading from the front was our NCOIC Sgt Weeks, who, in a recent email to us said, “I have never worked with a better group of females and would be happy to work beside you anytime.”  I couldn’t agree more.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 395 other followers